Friday, February 18, 2011

CBT & GET: The Studies, the Science and the Pseudoscience

I'm  more of a personal-experiences writer, definitely not a science writer, but for the sake of all my terribly ill friends who are being sent tripe by well-meaning persons, telling them to get well by pushing their limits and keeping a positive attitude, here are a few apt quotes and links.


To begin on a light note, here's an all-purpose reply for every one of those well-meaning efforts, from Sick Humor.

Fluff but not at all funny: the PACE Trials published yesterday in The Lancet, which ought to be ashamed for accepting such bad science for publication. Unfortunately this bad study is spawning the plethora of happy fluffy articles with which your friends and relations are cluttering your inbox.



Don't even click on those articles. What they say boils down to: "CBT and GET will make you well because we know what you really are is depressed and out of shape." Don't give them the satisfaction of a high hit volume. 

Instead, you can tell your well-wishers politely or otherwise that they ought to take a look at the more scientific study by Núñez et al, published 15 Jan 2011 in Clinical Rheumatology, which shows that treatment with CBT and GET actually makes ME worse. 


What's so unscientific about the study by White, Goldsmith et al in Lancet? To begin with, they aren't even studying patients with ME. They carefully selected their patient cohort to include only those likely to support the outcome they were looking for. They used the outdated Oxford Criteria which eliminate all patients with signs of neurological disease. Well guess what? ME is a neurological disease.

A patient describes the White, Goldsmith screening of subjects for their flawed study:

othersideofvenus (commenter to an article on the PACE study) wrote:

I took part in this study, and was randomised to the GET group, and I'd be very sceptical about its results.... My initial blood tests showed some signs of infection and inflammation so I was sent for another set which apparently didn't, so I could be accepted into the trial. The assessment/criteria forms which had to be filled out at the before and during the trial, did not mention symptoms after exertion or delayed onset fatigue, there was very little attention paid to pain and cognitive/mental issues were very blurred.
At the start of the trial, I had to wear an accelerometor thing for a week, presumably to measure activity levels. But at the end of the trial, this wasn't repeated. The fitness tests measured the number of steps I could do in a set amount of time, but paid no attention to the fact that I usually couldn't walk for 2 days after these assessments.
Why would scientists deliberately set out to create a flawed study? The entire approach to ME officially supported by the British health care system is based on treating the disease as psychological. It would cost a whole lot more money to treat the physical causes of the disease.  Further, the people currently in power, gaining salaries, royalties, speaking fees and study grants, want to stay in power. Conflicts of interest exist among those who make grant recommendations. Here's patient Siobhan McElwee's succinct take:
This is what happens when a wastebasket sort of diagnostic criteria is used. The Oxford Criteria which was used in this study does NOT differentiate between being chronically tired and depression and bonafide ME/CFS which has distinct neurological components. There seems to be an assumption that ME patients are professional, fear ridden couch potatoes with no vested interest in getting well. I find this almost funny. In the 80’s they told us it was because we were doing too much and type A personalities. Now they say we do too little and are afraid of moving about. Those who push the ‘psych’ theories on ME can’t even keep their stories straight over the long haul.

There is far more to ME/CFS than being chronically fatigued, a point that the powers that be seem to be conveniently overlooking.

Last time I checked a retrovirus could care less what one thinks. To date there’s not been a single retrovirus that does NOT cause immune, neurological and cancerous effect in humans. Gamma retroviruses (of which XMRV is one) in other species causes immune, neurological and cancerous effect in the species that they infect. Why is this so hard for the medical establishment at large to stomach?

Could it be that it just might require that money is going to have to be spent to actually TREAT millions of truly sick people worldwide? That money is going to have to be spent to screen the blood supplies? That careers are based on pushing this form of psychobabble on severely ill men , women and CHILDREN?

For shame.

But if "follow the money" works to explain why false solutions are pushed, it also can help lead to the real science. Siobhan further points out:

Big Pharma companies like Abbot Labs and Glaxo Smith Klein don't invest millions of their own $$ into virology studies based on a psych treatable disease.

That's right, the pharmaceutical giants are betting their dollars on the retroviral connection. And you can't fake for example results that show, as Singh et al have shown, that Raltegravir and Tenofavir are potent inhibitors of XMRV in vitro.

Further, those drugs are working not just in vitro but in patients. To follow the story of two patients experimentally taking the antiretrovirals with excellent results, see X Rx, the excellent blog of Dr. Jamie Deckoff-Jones. 

We're sick but we're not stupid. We patients aren't lazy or crazy---jumping jacks and chummy chats are not going to kill the retrovirus and the possibly numerous additional opportunistic infections that are wreaking havoc with our immune systems, our central and peripheral nervous systems and our circulatory systems.

Back as far as the 1980s, Doctors Peterson and Cheney were finding the CFS patients in their practice had minute, punctate lesions in brain myelination consistent with the cognitive losses they exhibited and that these lesions diminished and even disappeared with use of the experimental drug Ampligen, with patients showing simultaneous dimunition of the cognitive symptoms. Sorry I don't have a link for a study on this but it's documented in Hillary Johnson's excellent expose', Osler's Web, which I not only recommend you read, but I recommend you give a copy to each and every one of your beloved well-wishers who insult your integrity and intelligence with fluff pseudoscience promises of full recovery via the jumprope and the sharing circle.

In my last post, I used my beautiful, brilliant, tough and determined daughter as an example of one patient who needs real medicine, not CBT or GET. There are millions like her, waiting, while the grant money gets wasted on bad jokes like the PACE Trials.

Again, please appeal to your elected officials and write letters to editors, and blog and share, demanding real science. We need funding for studies on XMRV and other MLV pathogenesis, and on treatment with Ampligen, Raltegravir and Tenofavir, because what we have is infectious and debilitating retrovirus XMRV, not DUMB or LAZY. And work on convincing your well-wishers to help us with some real support for real science.

Thanks!

Please note: no offense is intended toward patients with, or doctors treating, real clinical depression, nor towards any reputable program of physical fitness or mental health. Yeah, I got a little scathing, but the scathe is directed at those who deliberately misdiagnose, mistreat and malpractice upon neuroimmune patients. 

9 comments:

  1. Very well said!

    ReplyDelete
  2. It makes me so angry that this GET approach could be causing irreversible damage to the heart. Thank you for exposing the lies.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Retro virus or no, ME is not emotional, though the emotional can influenced by the physical illness. And the mental is influenced, as is the emotional, through the illness itself. (I'm speaking of the cognitive losses that so many of us experience as a result of this neurological illness.)

    I find it funny that I was once thought to be type A and am know thought to be a forlorn couch potato.

    I did CBT in my 20s and all I was left with was a can do spirit. Well, that spirit certainly has helped as I became disabled ('cause I can do sick without becoming depressed). I have nothing against it. It's just not a cure for CFS. Indeed, it may very well have contributed to my becoming sicker because I was effectively in a state of denial with CBT.

    As for GET? It could be that people who are getting better while ill with ME/CFS might benefit (it happens... some with ME/CFS get better, and of those who get better, I've heard that their best tends to be about 80% of their former lives). I mean, if I were getting better and actually had the energy to do graded exercise, it would probably help with my lost muscle tone. But many with ME/CFS would probably become sicker with GET, particularly the sickest among us.

    I listen to my body. It tends to have variable needs that are difficult to read at best and when I overreach, I pay and pay and pay. Some days I have a handful of spoons and some days not so much. It is what it is. And it's better when I listen to my body then well I listen to that positive, upbeat message, "You can do it," that keeps repeating in my mind.

    It would be nice to see some research on people who actually have ME/CFS.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks, Creek. I especially like this: "We're sick but we're not stupid. We patients aren't lazy or crazy---jumping jacks and chummy chats are not going to kill the retrovirus and the possibly numerous additional opportunistic infections that are wreaking havoc with our immune systems, our central and peripheral nervous systems and our circulatory systems."

    Patricia Carter

    ReplyDelete
  5. The evidence that they actually set up the study in a manner that guaranteed that the findings would be false is very interesting, thank you for this post.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Good information here. I've linked to you on my own blog.

    ReplyDelete
  7. If GET and CBT can cure ME,

    then why did I get sicker and sicker when I was employed as a gardener. I gave up everything else before I gave up work. Cycling, fishing, swimming, DIY, socialising, and nintendo wii. I particularly miss the boxing.

    Since ignoring government guidelines, and listening to my OH and other PWME, I have slowed the deterioration down considerably.

    cheers fly

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thanks for sharing, youre so right, PACE is a joke. If only exercise could cure it, there wouldn't thousands of us so sick!!

    ReplyDelete
  9. <3 Best wishes. Thank you for sharing <3

    ReplyDelete